714 million voters casting votes in 828,804 polling stations across a sub-continent size country to elect 543 members of the parliament. A country that expects 5 per cent rate of growth in the down-turn of global economy days when many developed countries would be happy to register zero or fractional growth.
A country where some 400 million earn less than 2 dollars a day and may be some 200 million less than a dollar a day.
They believe they can make a change through voting. When after 60 years of independence politicians have consistently let them down. But that is conventional way of putting it.
It is really the people who have let themselves down though it is politically incorrect to say so in a democracy, esp at this hour of massive feel-good factor.
If people think elections can change their lives for better, it is not only escapism, it is abdicating their own responsibility in bringing about a change through non-electoral non-violent ways.
So, the ritual goes on. I had made a painting, some 5 years back - our last general election, and, sadly, it still holds true.
It is called -
India votes - a five year ritual of hope for the millions -
[link]
Devious Comments
--
You ain't so bad your self.
I see a resemblace of H.R. Giger as well as R.S Connett
Peter S Sibrin
I think democracy as we know it needs to change.
We, meaning two of us, come from societies situated at polar opposites in material well-being and still have the same conclusion, arising out of voter apathy at your end and over-reliance on electoral process at the Indian end.
Paradoxically, democracy seems stuck in both the worlds.It is not bringing about 'change'. While it has , may be reached its limit in bringing any material change about in a developed country [food, shelter, clothing, health,education asured at a minimum standard to every citizen - then where do go you from here?], it has conspicuously failed in providing these basic material needs of its cititzens in India.
That is what worried me too - has democracy just been an instrument of material change? And having served that purpose the West has lost its interest in sustaining it? Then is it not upto the privileged citizens to strive to make lot of those less privileged elsewhere better?
And if it is inadequate as an instrument of material change, is it not, again, to citizens to take initiative and strive towards it in the third world?
You can't win, like! Human indiference sets in when prosperity is assured.Human inertia engulfs the masses when it is nowhere in sight too.
--
ckp
discontent always
[link]
My Print Account
What I keep trying to hit home is that some people do not have a privileged base from which to begin to dig themselves out of the poverty they were born into. They have been hardwired to accept some norms and fight others, so they really don't begin from the same set of standards that my capitalist friends start from.
It's wonderful to think that all you have to do is work hard, and be good, and go to church, and enrole in clubs and sports and community groups, send cupcakes to school for the appropriate occations in order to DESERVE to live better than someone who came from an alcoholic, uneducated, povery-stricken family.
Not indifference. Shear blindness, self absorbtion and ignorance.
What it comes down, practically, is how we, the consumers of the products/services of the rich make them behave. That project we have given up. That is indifference.
People who never were potential of the capitalist products are out of the capitalists' purview anyway. Like the poor in say, Darfur. Anyway they are not going to buy a McDonald burger in their life-time, so capitalists can afford to be indifferent to them.But that indifference pales into shadow compared with our [commoners'] indifference which makes them thrive.And the ignorance of these 'middle-clsses' here leaves me aghast everytime I come across it afresh.
I'll give only two examples.
I remember a conversation with a vey senior educational psychologist here - a man supposedly well-read and obviously well-travelled. He asked me if it is so hot in India for most of the year, with such a large population, how many air-conditioners would be damaging the environment. I still bridle at the insolence based on ignorance. People do not have enough to EAT there throughout their lives, and this epitome of british establishment talks of air-conditioners! Even the middle class there can not afford it.And he is , as you say, a church-goer, an almost vegetarian and all.
Another guy, a medical doctor, spnsors an animal,each year in the name of each of his children as their birth-day present. He sponsored a few goats this year in Africa. I can not describe how furious I feel at this cosmetic charity.
Then we compress the space of manouvrability of 2 billion poor to get out of the straitjacket by non-violent means. Then some of them resort to ideological violence against the establishment as ultra-leftists in India, or, recently in Nepal; or muslim terrorists.
--
ckp
discontent always
[link]
My Print Account
Previous PageNext Page